releasing a wagon-ssh-external snapshot

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

releasing a wagon-ssh-external snapshot

Jason van Zyl
Hi,

A fellow in IRC is asking if we can deploy the external-ssh provider and
was just wondering if there's any reason why we might not want to deploy
a snapshot. I know the scp/ssh is being generally flaky lately and
didn't want to make things worse.

--

jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org

you are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in.
No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow.
They know it is going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically
dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of
dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or
goals are in doubt.

   -- Robert Pirzig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: releasing a wagon-ssh-external snapshot

brettporter
Administrator
Snapshot is a snapshot. We should always have the latest out there.

Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A fellow in IRC is asking if we can deploy the external-ssh provider and
> was just wondering if there's any reason why we might not want to deploy
> a snapshot. I know the scp/ssh is being generally flaky lately and
> didn't want to make things worse.
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: releasing a wagon-ssh-external snapshot

Jason van Zyl
Brett Porter wrote:
> Snapshot is a snapshot. We should always have the latest out there.

We should, yes. Just double checking as I don't know if there's been an
upgrade in the jsch library that might be causing a problems.

> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A fellow in IRC is asking if we can deploy the external-ssh provider and
>> was just wondering if there's any reason why we might not want to deploy
>> a snapshot. I know the scp/ssh is being generally flaky lately and
>> didn't want to make things worse.
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>


--

jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org

A man enjoys hsi work when he understands the whole and when he
is responsible for the quality of the whole

  -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: releasing a wagon-ssh-external snapshot

brettporter
Administrator
Snapshot of ssh-external != jsch?

Even if you are publishing snapshots of them all, I don't see this as a
problem.

- Brett

Jason van Zyl wrote:

> Brett Porter wrote:
>> Snapshot is a snapshot. We should always have the latest out there.
>
> We should, yes. Just double checking as I don't know if there's been an
> upgrade in the jsch library that might be causing a problems.
>
>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> A fellow in IRC is asking if we can deploy the external-ssh provider and
>>> was just wondering if there's any reason why we might not want to deploy
>>> a snapshot. I know the scp/ssh is being generally flaky lately and
>>> didn't want to make things worse.
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>
>>
>>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: releasing a wagon-ssh-external snapshot

Jason van Zyl
Brett Porter wrote:
> Snapshot of ssh-external != jsch?

Sorry, I was thinking of two sets of problems. The jsch problems and the
permissions problems with the external provider.

> Even if you are publishing snapshots of them all, I don't see this as a
> problem.

Just noticing all the grief with deployments of late and just didn't
want to make it worse is all.

I will deploy it now.

> - Brett
>
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>> Brett Porter wrote:
>>> Snapshot is a snapshot. We should always have the latest out there.
>> We should, yes. Just double checking as I don't know if there's been an
>> upgrade in the jsch library that might be causing a problems.
>>
>>> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> A fellow in IRC is asking if we can deploy the external-ssh provider and
>>>> was just wondering if there's any reason why we might not want to deploy
>>>> a snapshot. I know the scp/ssh is being generally flaky lately and
>>>> didn't want to make things worse.
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>
>


--

jvz.

Jason van Zyl
jason at maven.org
http://maven.apache.org

A man enjoys hsi work when he understands the whole and when he
is responsible for the quality of the whole

  -- Christopher Alexander, A Pattern Language

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]