Re: [VOTE] Requests to add to scheduled Maven CORE Release

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [VOTE] Requests to add to scheduled Maven CORE Release

Tibor Digana
Let's schedule the release day, no objections,  but there are still two
open issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MNG/versions/12338966
which have not been discussed yet.

On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:11 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi to all Devs,
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6492 review ok
>
>    To be honstest I see only a question about the details of it
>    by Michael Osipov. Nor do I see any implemented
>    code changes etc.
>
>    From my point of view no reason to postpone the release.
>
>    In the end: -1 postpone to next release
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6490 Karl, can You review?
>
>    I would like to have the opinion of other devs as well.
>
>    From my point view Ok to merge: +1 from me.
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6069 also for review
>
>    Unfortunately the IT's tell us there are issues also
>    on the fix/MNG-6096 branch which tells me it is not
>    that simple as expected.
>
>    From my point of view: -1 postpone to next release
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5693 code for review
>    + few ITs failed to changed output [2] ITs needs to be adjusted.
>
>    @Sylwester: Can you can create an appropriate branch in IT's
>                so we check if eveything works as expected.
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6481
>
>    From my point of view -1 cause for the release not critical.
>
>    This means to postpone it to the next release.
>
>    More important if core is working fine with JDK11 which is
>    the case.
>
> * quote from Sylwester: I also verified release with Synk.io
>    and we have only one report to upgrade Guava [4] to
>    version 24.1.1 or above (now with Guice 4.2 we use 23.6)
>
>    I have created MNG-6497 for this.
>    See what IT's etc. will tell us.
>
>    If all IT's are Ok I will VOTE: +1 for that.
>
>    If I read the description I would say it is not really
>    important for Maven Core cause as far as I know we don't
>    do any serialization etc.
>
>
> Kind regards
> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> [4]: https://app.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JAVA-COMGOOGLEGUAVA-32236
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>