# Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

 Classic List Threaded
5 messages
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

## Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

 Hi Enrico, I have got working build script and got some issues on integration tests in TestNG & Java 10. See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue because it is not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe the build would pass. [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java \${jacoco.agent} -jar C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698\surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tmp surefire_015474024382399849038tmp" On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> wrote: > It's ok, not annoying. > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and therefore I am > working on more difficult issue - the build process. > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found the > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script is in [2]. I > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 on Linux and > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5. > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-> surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/ > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-> 1463/Jenkinsfile > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> > wrote: > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy. >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users. >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue >> >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to 2.2 ? >> >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9 >> >> -- Enrico >> >> >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>: >> >> > >> > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha >> >> scritto: >> >> >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free. >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450>> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress: >> UnicodeTestNamesIT >> >>> and >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455). >> >>> >> >> >> > Tibor >> > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455>> > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is closed too >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461>> > >> > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open >> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=>> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open% >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion% >> 20%3D%202.21.0. >> > Jigsaw >> > >> > Do you need some help ? >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21 >> > >> > Thank you >> > Enrico >> > >> > >> >> >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best >> >> >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9. >> >>> >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli < >> [hidden email]> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > (resending) >> >>> > >> >>> > Hi Tibor, >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ? >> >>> > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help. >> >>> > >> >>> > Cheers >> >>> > >> >>> > Enrico >> >>> > >> >>> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli >> >> >> > >> > >> > >
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

## Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

 Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > > I have got working build script and got some issues on integration tests in > TestNG & Java 10. > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue because it is > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe the build > would pass. > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a Windows box to reproduce the issue. From the error I guess you are right Enrico > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java \${jacoco.agent} -jar > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698\surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698 > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tmp > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp" > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > It's ok, not annoying. > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and therefore I am > > working on more difficult issue - the build process. > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found the > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script is in [2]. > I > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 on Linux > and > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5. > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-> > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/ > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-> > 1463/Jenkinsfile > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy. > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users. > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue > >> > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to 2.2 ? > >> > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9 > >> > >> -- Enrico > >> > >> > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha > >> >> scritto: > >> >> > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free. > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450> >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress: > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT > >> >>> and > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455). > >> >>> > >> >> > >> > Tibor > >> > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455> >> > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is closed too > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461> >> > > >> > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=> >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open% > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion% > >> 20%3D%202.21.0. > >> > Jigsaw > >> > > >> > Do you need some help ? > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21 > >> > > >> > Thank you > >> > Enrico > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best > >> >> > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9. > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli < > >> [hidden email]> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > (resending) > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor, > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Cheers > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Enrico > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >> -- > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- -- Enrico Olivelli
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

## Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

 Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> ha scritto: > On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup > first > > > RC is expected really soon :-) > > > I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 bug > > (see > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365) > > > So I simply upgraded to commons-lang3 but now it looks enforcer is > > > configured to enforce 1.6. > > > Well as I was thinking: 1.6 really in 2018? > > > So I created SUREFIRE-1474 and push it. > > > Let me know if you have any issues with that? > > no issue with that: if people want old JDK, they need old Maven Surefire > > Plugin > > version, that's quite natural > > Please just add a table in the plugin doc about which is the latest > > Surefire > > version that support which JDK > > > > where is the page? > Is it this one? https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+JigsawEnrico > > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > > As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire ASAP now. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > Cheers > > > Olivier > > > > > > On 4 February 2018 at 19:11, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha > > scritto: > > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > > > > > > > I have got working build script and got some issues on integration > > tests > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > TestNG & Java 10. > > > > > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue > because > > it > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe the > > > > > build > > > > > would pass. > > > > > > > > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a Windows > > box > > > > to > > > > reproduce the issue. > > > > > > > > From the error I guess you are right > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C > > > > > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java \${jacoco.agent} -jar > > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698\ > > > > > > > > surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698 > > > > > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tmp > > > > > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana < > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > It's ok, not annoying. > > > > > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and therefore > > I am > > > > > > working on more difficult issue - the build process. > > > > > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found > the > > > > > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script is > in > > > > > > > > [2]. > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 on > > Linux > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5. > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-> > > > > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/ > > > > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-> > > > > > > 1463/Jenkinsfile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy. > > > > > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users. > > > > > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to > 2.2 ? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- Enrico > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email] > >: > > > > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli < > [hidden email] > > >: > > > > > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana < > [hidden email]> > > ha > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> scritto: > > > > > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free. > > > > > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug > > > > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450> > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress: > > > > > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> and > > > > > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455). > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Tibor > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is > closed > > too > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461> > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=> > > > > >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open% > > > > > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion% > > > > > >> > > > > > >> 20%3D%202.21.0. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Jigsaw > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Do you need some help ? > > > > > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21 > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Thank you > > > > > >> > Enrico > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9. > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli < > > > > > >> > > > > > >> [hidden email]> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >>> wrote: > > > > > >> >>> > (resending) > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor, > > > > > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire > > 2.21.0 > > > > > >> >>> > ? > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help. > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > Cheers > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > >> >>> > Enrico > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy> -- -- Enrico Olivelli
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

## Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

 On 9 February 2018 at 21:57, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> wrote: > Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> ha scritto: > > > On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]> > wrote: > > > > > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup > > first > > > > RC is expected really soon :-) > > > > I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 > bug > > > (see > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365) > > > > So I simply upgraded to commons-lang3 but now it looks enforcer is > > > > configured to enforce 1.6. > > > > Well as I was thinking: 1.6 really in 2018? > > > > So I created SUREFIRE-1474 and push it. > > > > Let me know if you have any issues with that? > > > no issue with that: if people want old JDK, they need old Maven > Surefire > > > Plugin > > > version, that's quite natural > > > Please just add a table in the plugin doc about which is the latest > > > Surefire > > > version that support which JDK > > > > > > > where is the page? > > > > Is it this one? > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsawnot sure if it's this page. I was looking for one with a kind of matrix saying jdk level for plugins etc... > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire ASAP now. > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Olivier > > > > > > > > On 4 February 2018 at 19:11, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> > > > wrote: > > > > > Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha > > > scritto: > > > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > > > > > > > > > I have got working build script and got some issues on > integration > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > TestNG & Java 10. > > > > > > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue > > because > > > it > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe > the > > > > > > build > > > > > > would pass. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a > Windows > > > box > > > > > to > > > > > reproduce the issue. > > > > > > > > > > From the error I guess you are right > > > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C > > > > > > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java \${jacoco.agent} -jar > > > > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\ > surefire3375403847264435698\ > > > > > > > > > > surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar > > > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\ > surefire3375403847264435698 > > > > > > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tmp > > > > > > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana < > > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > It's ok, not annoying. > > > > > > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and > therefore > > > I am > > > > > > > working on more difficult issue - the build process. > > > > > > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found > > the > > > > > > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script > is > > in > > > > > > > > > > [2]. > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 > on > > > Linux > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-> > > > > > > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/ > > > > > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-> > > > > > > > > > 1463/Jenkinsfile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy. > > > > > > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users. > > > > > > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to > > 2.2 ? > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> -- Enrico > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli < > [hidden email] > > >: > > > > > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli < > > [hidden email] > > > >: > > > > > > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana < > > [hidden email]> > > > ha > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> scritto: > > > > > > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free. > > > > > > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug > > > > > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress: > > > > > > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> and > > > > > > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455). > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Tibor > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is > > closed > > > too > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=> > > > > > >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open% > > > > > > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion% > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 20%3D%202.21.0. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Jigsaw > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Do you need some help ? > > > > > > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21 > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Thank you > > > > > > >> > Enrico > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9. > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli < > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> [hidden email]> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> >>> wrote: > > > > > > >> >>> > (resending) > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor, > > > > > > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire > > > 2.21.0 > > > > > > >> >>> > ? > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help. > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > Cheers > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > >> >>> > Enrico > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Olivier Lamy > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy> > > > > -- > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

## Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

 Jesus, the things are different. Let it be I will complete it this weekend!!! On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> wrote: > this build is failing: > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/> surefire/job/SUREFIRE-1463/136/console > to be able to run with jdk9/10 we need to change enforcer jdk rule which is > currently [1.8, 1.9) > until this change we cannot build with 9/10 without skipping enforcer check > So if we want to build with 9/10 we must change that or remove this rule > which doesn't help for testing with new jdk.... > > On 10 February 2018 at 10:35, Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > If you could see my issues reported to INFRA you would see what is going > > on. I am currently running 23 parallel jobs, also supporting JDK10. > > If they run standalone there is no issue. Once the machine is overloaded > 3 > > or 4 problems happen nevertheless JDK is set. > > So from my side it is working on JDKs but I want to working on these few > > issues and change the concurrency in the build script. > > I will work on it this weekend. > > I will get back to you tomorrow evening. > > > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > > > On 9 February 2018 at 21:57, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> ha scritto: > > > > > > > > > On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 > > (yup > > > > > first > > > > > > > RC is expected really soon :-) > > > > > > > I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a > > commons-lang3 > > > > bug > > > > > > (see > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365) > > > > > > > So I simply upgraded to commons-lang3 but now it looks enforcer > > is > > > > > > > configured to enforce 1.6. > > > > > > > Well as I was thinking: 1.6 really in 2018? > > > > > > > So I created SUREFIRE-1474 and push it. > > > > > > > Let me know if you have any issues with that? > > > > > > no issue with that: if people want old JDK, they need old Maven > > > > Surefire > > > > > > Plugin > > > > > > version, that's quite natural > > > > > > Please just add a table in the plugin doc about which is the > latest > > > > > > Surefire > > > > > > version that support which JDK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > where is the page? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it this one? > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw> > > > > > > > > not sure if it's this page. I was looking for one with a kind of matrix > > > saying jdk level for plugins etc... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > > > > > > As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire ASAP now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > Olivier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 4 February 2018 at 19:11, Enrico Olivelli < > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana < > [hidden email]> > > > ha > > > > > > scritto: > > > > > > > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have got working build script and got some issues on > > > > integration > > > > > > tests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TestNG & Java 10. > > > > > > > > > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the > issue > > > > > because > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. > > Maybe > > > > the > > > > > > > > > build > > > > > > > > > would pass. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a > > > > Windows > > > > > > box > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > reproduce the issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From the error I guess you are right > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X > /C > > > > > > > > > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java > \${jacoco.agent} > > > -jar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\ > > > > surefire3375403847264435698\ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\ > > > > surefire3375403847264435698 > > > > > > > > > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 > > surefire15708374661287747855tm > > > p > > > > > > > > > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana < > > > > > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It's ok, not annoying. > > > > > > > > > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and > > > > therefore > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > > working on more difficult issue - the build process. > > > > > > > > > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and > > > found > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build > > script > > > > is > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, > 9, > > 10 > > > > on > > > > > > Linux > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/> > > view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-> > > > > > > > > > > > > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/ > > > > > > > > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/> > maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1463/Jenkinsfile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli < > > > > > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy. > > > > > > > > > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users. > > > > > > > > > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that > > > issue > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be > post-poned > > to > > > > > 2.2 ? > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9 > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> -- Enrico > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli < > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli < > > > > > [hidden email] > > > > > > >: > > > > > > > > > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana < > > > > > [hidden email]> > > > > > > ha > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> scritto: > > > > > > > > > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free. > > > > > > > > > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug > > > > > > > > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress: > > > > > > > > > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> and > > > > > > > > > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455). > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Tibor > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed > > > > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT > is > > > > > closed > > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/> > jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql= > > > > > > > > > >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open% > > > > > > > > > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND% > > > 20fixVersion% > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> 20%3D%202.21.0. > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > Jigsaw > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Do you need some help ? > > > > > > > > > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21 > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > Thank you > > > > > > > > > >> > Enrico > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the > best > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9. > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli < > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> [hidden email]> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> >>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > (resending) > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor, > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of > > > surefire > > > > > > 2.21.0 > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > ? > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to > > help. > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > Cheers > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > > > > > > > > > > >> >>> > Enrico > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > --------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Olivier Lamy > > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Olivier Lamy > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy> > > > > > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy>