Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

Enrico Olivelli
Sorry, I don't want to annoy.
I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users.
I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue

Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to 2.2 ?

2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9

-- Enrico


2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>:

>
>
> 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>:
>
>>
>>
>> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha
>> scritto:
>>
>>> I was busy at work but now I am free.
>>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
>>> I should fix branches which are already in progress: UnicodeTestNamesIT
>>> and
>>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455).
>>>
>>
> Tibor
>
> I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455
>
> And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is closed too
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461
>
>
> It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=
> project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%
> 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.21.0.
> Jigsaw
>
> Do you need some help ?
> I am looking forward a release of 2.21
>
> Thank you
> Enrico
>
>
>>
>> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best
>>
>> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > (resending)
>>> >
>>> > Hi Tibor,
>>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire 2.21.0 ?
>>> >
>>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> >
>>> > Enrico
>>> >
>>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> -- Enrico Olivelli
>>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

Gary Gregory-2
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup first
> RC is expected really soon :-)
> I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 bug (see
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365)
> So I simply upgraded to commons-lang3 but now it looks enforcer is
> configured to enforce 1.6.
> Well as I was thinking: 1.6 really in 2018?
> So I created SUREFIRE-1474 and push it.
> Let me know if you have any issues with that?
> As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire ASAP now.
>
> WDYT?
>

Everytime I want to build with Java 10, I run into this problem. I am +1
(non-binding) for making Java 7 the minimum and updating to the latest
Apache Commons Lang.

Gary


>
> Cheers
> Olivier
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4 February 2018 at 19:11, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha
> scritto:
> >
> > > Hi Enrico,
> > >
> > > I have got working build script and got some issues on integration
> tests
> > in
> > > TestNG & Java 10.
> > > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue because it
> > is
> > > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe the
> build
> > > would pass.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a Windows box
> to
> > reproduce the issue.
> >
> > From the error I guess you are right
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > >
> > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C
> > > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java ${jacoco.agent} -jar
> > >
> > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698\
> > surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar
> > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698
> > > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tmp
> > > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana <[hidden email]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's ok, not annoying.
> > > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and therefore I
> am
> > > > working on more difficult issue - the build process.
> > > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found the
> > > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script is in
> > [2].
> > > I
> > > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 on
> Linux
> > > and
> > > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5.
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-
> > > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/
> > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-
> > > > 1463/Jenkinsfile
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy.
> > > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users.
> > > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue
> > > >>
> > > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to 2.2 ?
> > > >>
> > > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9
> > > >>
> > > >> -- Enrico
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>:
> > > >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]>
> ha
> > > >> >> scritto:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free.
> > > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
> > > >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress:
> > > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT
> > > >> >>> and
> > > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455).
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> > Tibor
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed
> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455
> > > >> >
> > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is closed
> too
> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open
> > > >> >
> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=
> > > >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%
> > > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%
> > > >> 20%3D%202.21.0.
> > > >> > Jigsaw
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Do you need some help ?
> > > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thank you
> > > >> > Enrico
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9.
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > >> [hidden email]>
> > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >>> > (resending)
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor,
> > > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire
> 2.21.0 ?
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>> > Cheers
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>> > Enrico
> > > >> >>> >
> > > >> >>>
> > > >> >> --
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

rfscholte
I assume that library still uses an enum, which means an upgrade will be  
required with every new Java release.
I'd prefer to switch to Plexus Java, which won't have such issue.
I can re-implement that now or after a release of surefire.

Robert

On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:15:53 +0100, Gary Gregory <[hidden email]>  
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 10:45 PM, Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup  
>> first
>> RC is expected really soon :-)
>> I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 bug  
>> (see
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365)
>> So I simply upgraded to commons-lang3 but now it looks enforcer is
>> configured to enforce 1.6.
>> Well as I was thinking: 1.6 really in 2018?
>> So I created SUREFIRE-1474 and push it.
>> Let me know if you have any issues with that?
>> As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire ASAP now.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>
> Everytime I want to build with Java 10, I run into this problem. I am +1
> (non-binding) for making Java 7 the minimum and updating to the latest
> Apache Commons Lang.
>
> Gary
>
>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4 February 2018 at 19:11, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha
>> scritto:
>> >
>> > > Hi Enrico,
>> > >
>> > > I have got working build script and got some issues on integration
>> tests
>> > in
>> > > TestNG & Java 10.
>> > > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue  
>> because it
>> > is
>> > > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe the
>> build
>> > > would pass.
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a Windows  
>> box
>> to
>> > reproduce the issue.
>> >
>> > From the error I guess you are right
>> >
>> > Enrico
>> >
>> > >
>> > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C
>> > > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java ${jacoco.agent} -jar
>> > >
>> > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698\
>> > surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar
>> > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698
>> > > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tmp
>> > > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp"
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana  
>> <[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > It's ok, not annoying.
>> > > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and therefore  
>> I
>> am
>> > > > working on more difficult issue - the build process.
>> > > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found  
>> the
>> > > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script is  
>> in
>> > [2].
>> > > I
>> > > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 on
>> Linux
>> > > and
>> > > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5.
>> > > >
>> > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-
>> > > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/
>> > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-
>> > > > 1463/Jenkinsfile
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli  
>> <[hidden email]
>> >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy.
>> > > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users.
>> > > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to 2.2  
>> ?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -- Enrico
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli  
>> <[hidden email]>:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana  
>> <[hidden email]>
>> ha
>> > > >> >> scritto:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free.
>> > > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
>> > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
>> > > >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress:
>> > > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT
>> > > >> >>> and
>> > > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455).
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> > Tibor
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed
>> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is closed
>> too
>> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=
>> > > >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%
>> > > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%
>> > > >> 20%3D%202.21.0.
>> > > >> > Jigsaw
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Do you need some help ?
>> > > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Thank you
>> > > >> > Enrico
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9.
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
>> > > >> [hidden email]>
>> > > >> >>> wrote:
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >>> > (resending)
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor,
>> > > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire
>> 2.21.0 ?
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > Cheers
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>> > Enrico
>> > > >> >>> >
>> > > >> >>>
>> > > >> >> --
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olivier Lamy
>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

olamy
In reply to this post by Enrico Olivelli
On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup first
> > RC is expected really soon :-)
> > I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3 bug
> (see
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365)
> > So I simply upgraded to commons-lang3 but now it looks enforcer is
> > configured to enforce 1.6.
> > Well as I was thinking: 1.6 really in 2018?
> > So I created SUREFIRE-1474 and push it.
> > Let me know if you have any issues with that?
> no issue with that: if people want old JDK, they need old Maven Surefire
> Plugin
> version, that's quite natural
> Please just add a table in the plugin doc about which is the latest
> Surefire
> version that support which JDK
>

where is the page?


>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> > As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire ASAP now.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Olivier
> >
> > On 4 February 2018 at 19:11, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > > Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]> ha
> scritto:
> > > > Hi Enrico,
> > > >
> > > > I have got working build script and got some issues on integration
> tests
> > >
> > > in
> > >
> > > > TestNG & Java 10.
> > > > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue because
> it
> > >
> > > is
> > >
> > > > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe the
> > > > build
> > > > would pass.
> > >
> > > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a Windows
> box
> > > to
> > > reproduce the issue.
> > >
> > > From the error I guess you are right
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C
> > > > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java ${jacoco.agent} -jar
> > > >
> > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698\
> > >
> > > surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar
> > >
> > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\surefire3375403847264435698
> > > > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tmp
> > > > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana <
> [hidden email]>
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > It's ok, not annoying.
> > > > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and therefore
> I am
> > > > > working on more difficult issue - the build process.
> > > > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and found the
> > > > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script is in
> > >
> > > [2].
> > >
> > > > I
> > > >
> > > > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10 on
> Linux
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > >
> > > > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-> >
> > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/
> > > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-> > >
> > 1463/Jenkinsfile
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli <
> [hidden email]>
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy.
> > > > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users.
> > > > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that issue
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to 2.2 ?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -- Enrico
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>:
> > > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]
> >:
> > > > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]>
> ha
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> scritto:
> > > > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free.
> > > > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
> > > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress:
> > > > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >>> and
> > > > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Tibor
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed
> > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is closed
> too
> > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=
> > > > >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%
> > > > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20fixVersion%
> > > > >>
> > > > >> 20%3D%202.21.0.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Jigsaw
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Do you need some help ?
> > > > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thank you
> > > > >> > Enrico
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9.
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [hidden email]>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > >> >>> > (resending)
> > > > >> >>> >
> > > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor,
> > > > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of surefire
> 2.21.0
> > > > >> >>> > ?
> > > > >> >>> >
> > > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
> > > > >> >>> >
> > > > >> >>> > Cheers
> > > > >> >>> >
> > > > >> >>> > Enrico
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> --
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >>
> > > > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Enrico Olivelli
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
>
>


--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Surefire 2.21 release date ?

Tibor Digana
If you could see my issues reported to INFRA you would see what is going
on. I am currently running 23 parallel jobs, also supporting JDK10.
If they run standalone there is no issue. Once the machine is overloaded 3
or 4 problems happen nevertheless JDK is set.
So from my side it is working on JDKs but I want to working on these few
issues and change the concurrency in the build script.
I will work on it this weekend.
I will get back to you tomorrow evening.

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> wrote:

> On 9 February 2018 at 21:57, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy <[hidden email]> ha scritto:
> >
> > > On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup
> > > first
> > > > > RC is expected really soon :-)
> > > > > I can't get failsafe working with jdk10 because of a commons-lang3
> > bug
> > > > (see
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1473 due to
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1365)
> > > > > So I simply upgraded to commons-lang3 but now it looks enforcer is
> > > > > configured to enforce 1.6.
> > > > > Well as I was thinking: 1.6 really in 2018?
> > > > > So I created SUREFIRE-1474 and push it.
> > > > > Let me know if you have any issues with that?
> > > > no issue with that: if people want old JDK, they need old Maven
> > Surefire
> > > > Plugin
> > > > version, that's quite natural
> > > > Please just add a table in the plugin doc about which is the latest
> > > > Surefire
> > > > version that support which JDK
> > > >
> > >
> > > where is the page?
> > >
> >
> > Is it this one?
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw
>
>
> not sure if it's this page. I was looking for one with a kind of matrix
> saying jdk level for plugins etc...
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> >
>
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Hervé
> > > >
> > > > > As jdk10 is very soon. I'm happy to release surefire ASAP now.
> > > > >
> > > > > WDYT?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Olivier
> > > > >
> > > > > On 4 February 2018 at 19:11, Enrico Olivelli <[hidden email]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Il dom 4 feb 2018, 19:38 Tibor Digana <[hidden email]>
> ha
> > > > scritto:
> > > > > > > Hi Enrico,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have got working build script and got some issues on
> > integration
> > > > tests
> > > > > >
> > > > > > in
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > TestNG & Java 10.
> > > > > > > See this CLI. I think the JaCoCo Agent property is the issue
> > > because
> > > > it
> > > > > >
> > > > > > is
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > not resolved. I will try to put an empty string in there. Maybe
> > the
> > > > > > > build
> > > > > > > would pass.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you Tibor for the update. Unfortunately I don't have a
> > Windows
> > > > box
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > reproduce the issue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From the error I guess you are right
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Enrico
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > [windows-jdk10-maven3.5.x] [ERROR] Command was cmd.exe /X /C
> > > > > > > "F:\jenkins\tools\java\jdk10-ea+37\bin\java ${jacoco.agent}
> -jar
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\
> > surefire3375403847264435698\
> > > > > >
> > > > > > surefirebooter6458194328264691762.jar
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > C:\Users\jenkins\AppData\Local\Temp\1\
> > surefire3375403847264435698
> > > > > > > 2018-02-04T17-23-23_801-jvmRun1 surefire15708374661287747855tm
> p
> > > > > > > surefire_015474024382399849038tmp"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM, Tibor Digana <
> > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > It's ok, not annoying.
> > > > > > > > The issue SUREFIRE-1374 is quite easy to workaround and
> > therefore
> > > > I am
> > > > > > > > working on more difficult issue - the build process.
> > > > > > > > So regarding build process I contacted our INFRA team and
> found
> > > the
> > > > > > > > problem. Now the build is running in [1] and the build script
> > is
> > > in
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [2].
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > should get this working first. We are testing JDK 7, 8, 9, 10
> > on
> > > > Linux
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Windows and Maven 3.2 - 3.5.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]: https://builds.apache.org/
> view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven->
> > >
> > > > > > surefire-pipeline/job/SUREFIRE-1463/
> > > > > > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/SUREFIRE-
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > 1463/Jenkinsfile
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> Sorry, I don't want to annoy.
> > > > > > > >> I see that SUREFIRE-1374 needs feedback from users.
> > > > > > > >> I took a look but I don't know how to move forward that
> issue
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Is it a blocker for 2.21 release ? o can it be post-poned to
> > > 2.2 ?
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 2.21 is a great milestone to move people to Java 9
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> -- Enrico
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 2018-01-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> > [hidden email]
> > > >:
> > > > > > > >> > 2018-01-16 21:26 GMT+01:00 Enrico Olivelli <
> > > [hidden email]
> > > > >:
> > > > > > > >> >> Il gio 11 gen 2018, 22:26 Tibor Digana <
> > > [hidden email]>
> > > > ha
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> scritto:
> > > > > > > >> >>> I was busy at work but now I am free.
> > > > > > > >> >>> I need to have a help with investigating a bug
> > > > > > > >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1450
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> >>> I should fix branches which are already in progress:
> > > > > > > >> UnicodeTestNamesIT
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> >>> and
> > > > > > > >> >>> JaCoCO (SUREFIRE-1455).
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Tibor
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > I see that now SUREFIRE-1455 (JaCoCo) is closed
> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1455
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > And I see that SUREFIRE-1461 about UnicodeTestNamesIT is
> > > closed
> > > > too
> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1461
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > It seems that for 2.21 there is only one task open
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1374?jql=
> > > > > > > >> > project%20%3D%20SUREFIRE%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%
> > > > > > > >> > 2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%
> 20fixVersion%
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> 20%3D%202.21.0.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > Jigsaw
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Do you need some help ?
> > > > > > > >> > I am looking forward a release of 2.21
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Thank you
> > > > > > > >> > Enrico
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >> I can pick one on these, just tell me which is the best
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> Then all ITs setup with JDK 9.
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> [hidden email]>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >>> > (resending)
> > > > > > > >> >>> >
> > > > > > > >> >>> > Hi Tibor,
> > > > > > > >> >>> > Do you have any plan about the release date of
> surefire
> > > > 2.21.0
> > > > > > > >> >>> > ?
> > > > > > > >> >>> >
> > > > > > > >> >>> > If you have some tasks to do I will be happy to help.
> > > > > > > >> >>> >
> > > > > > > >> >>> > Cheers
> > > > > > > >> >>> >
> > > > > > > >> >>> > Enrico
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> --
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >>
> > > > > > > >> >> -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden email]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Olivier Lamy
> > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>