I'm not sure which part of activeByDefault you are refering to, could
you clarify that?
Le 28/06/2017 à 22:43, Mark H. Wood a écrit :
> I just got bitten by "activeByDefault doesn't mean what everyone
> thinks it means." OK, that's the way it is. But I have some
> o Real-world use case for the current behavior?
> o Is there some reason why the meaning of
> is not documented in the POM reference?
> o Where *is* it documented? Lots of people seem to know about it.