[Commented] (MNG-6588) Naming conventions should be more technical

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Commented] (MNG-6588) Naming conventions should be more technical

JIRA jira@apache.org

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16766283#comment-16766283 ]

Elliotte Rusty Harold commented on MNG-6588:
--------------------------------------------

Probably just a reference to the relevant Java name rules. I recall that these are the same.

> Naming conventions should be more technical
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-6588
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6588
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documentation:  General
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.0
>            Reporter: Elliotte Rusty Harold
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation
>
> We should give a precise grammar for group IDs, artifact IDs and versions on https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-naming-conventions.html
> rather than fuzzy language like "you can choose whatever name you want with lowercase letters and no strange symbols"
> This can probably be done by reference to the Java naming rules rather than spelling it out.
> The version section should mention semantic versioning and Snapshots.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)